Ex-post-doc Laura, Craig, Antony and colleagues from Sweden have just published a paper Low sensitivity of reproductive life-stages in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) to abamectin in the journal Chemosphere. The paper is pretty much what’s in the title – using a range of ecotoxicology assays, including our new method for assessing sperm motility, we assessed  a compound (abamectin) which is being considered as an additive to antifouling paints.  More generally, abamectin is part of the avermectin family of compounds, which are commonly used for treating lice in livestock on land (and in aquaculture in the sea) and can be quite effective (toxic) to their target organisms.  Although the sorts of antifouling paints considering including abamectin are very slow release, there is still the potential that their release of compounds like abamectin could have unintended effects on non-target organisms away from painted surfaces.  In general, we found that oysters were relatively insensitive to abamectin doses likely to occur from slow release paints for short periods of time, although previous studies suggest that sometimes other organisms can apparently be much more sensitive than what we observed.

The abstract from the paper is pasted below and a free pdf can be downloaded for fifty days, after which an authors’ copy will be available from the UCL research publication service

Abstract

Hard surfaces submerged in the marine environment often become colonised by macro-organisms unless the surfaces have some form of biofouling protection. While protective paints that contain tributyltin or copper work well to prevent biofouling, release of these materials into the environment has been shown to have wider negative impacts. Consequently, new low-release antifouling paints are being developed with alternative active ingredients, such as avermectins, yet little is known about their potential effects on non-target organisms in marine environments. Here we investigated the toxicity of a key avermectin, specifically abamectin, on several aspects of reproduction (sperm motility, fertilisation success, early larval development) in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Oyster reproduction was generally insensitive to the low concentrations of abamectin, although greater concentrations of abamectin did negatively affect all three endpoints – LOECs were 1000 μg l−1, 500 μg l−1, and 100 μg l−1 abamectin for sperm motility, fertilisation success, and larval development, respectively. A similar pattern was found in the EC50s of the three endpoints (mean ± SE) 934 ± 59 μg l−1, 1076.26 ± 725.61 μg l−1, and 140 ± 78 μg l−1 abamectin (sperm motility, fertilisation success, and larval development, respectively). Together, these results clearly indicate that of the three endpoints considered, larval development was more sensitive to abamectin (lower LOEC, EC50) than fertilisation success and sperm motility. Although more data are needed from a wider range of marine species and environments to fully assess potential toxicity effects on non-target organisms, our results highlight the potential utility of abamectin in low-release antifouling paints.